Black Wolf Path Journal
An Independent Publication of Private Law, Sovereignty, and Practical Remedy

The PREP Act Is Void: A Legal and Scientific Analysis

Emerging scientific research, most notably presented by Daniel Roytas in Can You Catch a Cold?, provides a compelling challenge to the foundational assumptions behind modern virology. More than 70 scientific experiments attempting to demonstrate viral contagion have failed. These findings, supported by works such as A Farewell to Virology, Settling the Virus Debate, and TGP: A Virus Like No Other, collectively demonstrate that viruses have never been conclusively proven to cause illness. In fact, there is no scientifically verified instance in history of a sick person transmitting illness to a healthy person through a virus, despite over seventy controlled experiments attempting to prove this.

Given this scientific context, the PREP Act must be critically reexamined. When assessed against the frameworks of Organic Law, Natural Law, Trust Law, and Common Law, the PREP Act reveals itself not as a protective statute but as a deeply flawed legal instrument founded on misinformation and implemented through systemic coercion.

Analysis Under Organic Law

The Organic Laws of the united States of America include:

The Declaration of Independence
The Articles of Confederation
The Northwest Ordinance
The Constitution for the united States of America (1787)

Identified Violations :

The PREP Act presumes emergency powers outside constitutional limits, violating Article I, Section 1 (only Congress may legislate) and the separation of powers doctrine.
It bypasses lawful due process by granting blanket immunity to private corporations without oversight or recourse.
It undermines the sovereignty of the states by creating federally controlled frameworks for medical intervention.
It obscures transparency and prevents lawful remedy by shielding harmful actors from accountability through federal protections.
The Act creates an administrative override on constitutional protections, violating the right to petition for redress of grievances and the foundational consent-based nature of governance.
The invocation of emergency powers on scientifically discredited grounds severs lawful ties to the People and operates instead under corporate policy fiction.
The Act violates the public trust established in the Declaration of Independence by removing informed consent, presuming authority through fear, and assuming jurisdiction without direct representation.

These violations of Organic Law alone are enough to render the Act void—but when we expand to Natural Law, the contradictions deepen.

Violations of Natural Law

Coercion through fear-based tactics (e.g., media messaging, emergency declarations) violates free will and the principle of non-aggression.
Bodily autonomy, a cornerstone of Natural Law, is negated by implied mandates, experimental injections, and restricted access to dissenting information.
Fraud—by definition—is a violation of Natural Law. The reliance on disproven virology and the suppression of alternatives constitutes institutional deception.
Consent must be fully informed and freely given. The PREP Act distorts this through semantic manipulation, crisis framing, and immunity shields.
The use of predictive programming and trauma-based compliance conditions the public to outsource internal moral authority to external “experts”—a spiritual violation of self-governance.
Suppression of alternative healing modalities violates the natural diversity of remedy, intuition, and choice—replacing inherent wisdom with forced uniformity.
Natural Law flows from Source—not statute—and any act that violates bodily sovereignty, informed volition, or spiritual alignment is not merely illegal but unlawful in its highest sense.

The Act does not merely bend Natural Law—it tramples its most essential principles.

Breach of Trust Law

A valid trust requires: full disclosure, lawful purpose, clear parties, and no fraud. The PREP Act fails all four.
Trustees (government and agencies) have acted in breach of fiduciary duty by prioritizing private profit over public welfare.
The people, as unwitting beneficiaries, were denied access to remedy, choice, and truthful information.
The structural use of emergency declarations to bypass equity and conceal remedy options constitutes a knowing breach of trust principles.
The PREP Act weaponizes the concept of “public health” as a false beneficiary class, granting blanket authority to unelected officials and corporations under color of law.
Assets (bodies, rights, and informed consent) were administratively transferred into third-party control without lawful disclosure, violating the equitable maxim “he who holds the benefit must bear the burden.”
By obscuring the path to remedy, the trust framework is converted into an opaque control mechanism—one that mirrors feudal systems where the people are held as surety to corporate debts.

Where there is no transparency and no path to equitable remedy, there can be no lawful trust.

Violations of Common Law

No injured party. No corpus delicti. The foundation of lawful action is the presence of harm. The PREP Act imposes authority without an injured party.
Remedy is blocked by design. Common law provides that where there is a wrong, there must be a remedy. The PREP Act removes that remedy via immunity provisions.
False presumption of consent. Common law protects the sanctity of contract, but this statute uses assumed consent via legal fiction and emergency powers.
Weaponization of process. The use of emergency declarations to create a permanent state of exception violates the spirit and structure of common law justice.
Corporate entities operating under color of government authority create the illusion of lawful process while shielding bad actors from liability—eliminating access to genuine grievance redress.
By stripping men and women of their right to face their accuser, confront evidence, and have impartial hearings, the Act reinstates a system of commercial martial law under administrative guise.
The suppression of remedy through blanket immunity contradicts the common law maxim: ubi jus ibi remedium — “where there is a right, there is a remedy.”

These violations build upon each other. When we step from the lens of Common Law into a wider legal and spiritual perspective, the weight of the betrayal becomes undeniable.

Conclusion

In Summary:

The PREP Act violates four foundational systems of law.
It relies on disproven science and denies remedy.
It is void from inception and incompatible with any lawful society.

Legal Framework	Violation	Nature of Infraction
Organic Law	Confirmed	Rights suspension, federal overreach
Natural Law	Confirmed	Fraud, coercion, spiritual violation
Trust Law	Confirmed	Fiduciary betrayal, lack of disclosure
Common Law	Confirmed	Harm without remedy, institutional fraud

The convergence of scientific evidence and legal principle leaves no room for ambiguity: the PREP Act is not lawful. It is a construct of institutional fraud, mass coercion, and calculated betrayal—cloaked in the rhetoric of public health.

As such, the PREP Act is void ab initio—invalid from its inception.

In the next phase, we will explore how psychological manipulation techniques, as outlined in The 48 Laws of Power, were deployed to gain public compliance and suppress dissent.